JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 22, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Luis Alfredo Jimenez Avellaneda·Respondent Ingetecho Y Construcciones Sas

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Factor territorial
  • Competencia a prevención
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Sopó y el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Tocancipá.

Teniendo en cuenta que al accionante eligió presentar la acción de tutela ante los jueces municipales de Sopó, considera la Corte que se debe respetar dicha elección, máxime cuando dichas autoridades resultan competentes para asumir el conocimiento del asunto.

Se ordena la remisión del expediente al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de esa entidad territorial, para que de manera inmediata tramite y adopte la decisión de fondo a que haya lugar.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el Auto del 14 de junio de 2017 proferido por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Sopó, dentro del expediente ICC-3026.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Sopó el expediente ICC-3026, para que, de manera inmediata tramite y adopte la decisión de fondo a que haya lugar, dentro de la acción de tutela presentada por Luis Alfredo Jiménez Avellaneda contra la empresa Ingetecho y Construcciones S.A.S.
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se comunique la decisión adoptada en esta providencia a las partes y al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Tocancipá.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.